Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChaves, V.
dc.contributor.authorBalbín Molina, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, A.
dc.contributor.authorSusmel, L.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T11:47:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T11:47:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.identifier.citationChaves, V., Balbín, J. A., Navarro, A., Susmel, L., & Taylor, D. (2023). Calculations of biaxial fatigue limits with models using the experimental crack direction. In International Journal of Fatigue (Vol. 174, p. 107726). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107726es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0142-1123
dc.identifier.issn1879-3452 (electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10272/22412
dc.description.abstractSeveral models from the literature were used to predict the fatigue limit in notched components subjected to biaxial cyclic loading. The predictions of these models are based on the elastic stresses along a line which is considered to be representative of the crack direction in its initial part. The line used in the models changes considerably. For one of the studied models, the line direction corresponds to Mode I, while for another it is Mode II, and for the other two models considered the direction is between Mode I and Mode II. However, quite naturally, the experimental crack direction is unique. In recent years, a study of experimental fatigue limits and crack directions in its initial part for three materials was carried out in hollow cylindrical specimens with a circular hole subjected to cyclic axial, torsional and in-phase biaxial loading. The directions of the cracks that were measured experimentally are on average similar for the three materials and close to Mode I. The analysed models give, in general, good predictions of the experimental fatigue limits, although they use directions that are completely different and that they too differ markedly from the experimentally found ones. The predictions of the models using, in a forced way, the measured experimental directions are good in most cases, which reveals a surprising insensitivity of these models to the main hypotheses on which their own formulations are based.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the European Union, the Spanish Government and the Junta de Andalucía, Spain, for its financial support through grants PID2020-117407GB-I00 (FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - Agencia Estatal de Investigación) and P18-FR-4306 ("Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) y Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad de la Junta de Andalucía, dentro del Programa Operativo FEDER 2014-2020").es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher’s version
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherMultiaxial fatiguees_ES
dc.subject.otherNotches_ES
dc.subject.otherFatigue limites_ES
dc.subject.otherCrack pathes_ES
dc.subject.otherBiaxial cyclic loadinges_ES
dc.titleCalculations of biaxial fatigue limits with models using the experimental crack directiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107726
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco3313 Tecnología E Ingeniería Mecánicases_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España

Copyright © 2008-2010. ARIAS MONTANO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
Contact Us | Send Feedback |