dc.contributor.author | Ullrich, Heiko | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-13T10:43:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-13T10:43:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10272/21525 | |
dc.description.abstract | Die Umstellung von Lucr. 5.30 hinter 5.31 (Marullus) und die Konjektur et aues anstelle des überlieferten nobis (Lachmann) werden verteidigt; zusätzlich wird für das überlieferte tanto opere die Konjektur taetro ore vorgeschlagen. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | The transposition of Lucr. 5.30 after 5.31 (Marullus) and the emendation et aues for the transmitted nobis (Lachmann) are defended; additionally the emendation taetro ore is suggested for the transmitted tanto opere. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | deu | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Huelva | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Lukrez | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | De rerum natura | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Buch 5 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Textkritik | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Lucretius | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Book 5 | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Textual criticism | es_ES |
dc.title | Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Lucr. 5.30 | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.33776/ec.v25i0.5516 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | 5505.10 Filología | es_ES |