dc.contributor.author | Nitsche, Michael A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gutiérrez Lérida, Carolina | |
dc.contributor.author | Salas Sánchez, Ángeles | |
dc.contributor.author | Martín Riquel, Raquel | |
dc.contributor.author | Andújar Barroso, Rafael Tomás | |
dc.contributor.author | Alameda Bailén, José Ramón | |
dc.contributor.author | García Palomeque, Jesús Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina, Guadalupe | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-02T12:36:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-02T12:36:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Molero-Chamizo, A., Nitsche, M. A., Gutiérrez Lérida, C., Salas Sánchez, Á., Martín Riquel, R., Andújar Barroso, R. T., Alameda Bailén, J. R., García Palomeque, J. C., & Rivera-Urbina, G. N. (2021). Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches. In Biology (Vol. 10, Issue 12, p. 1230). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10121230 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2079-7737 (electrónico) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10272/20295 | |
dc.description.abstract | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation procedure
to modulate cortical excitability and related brain functions. tDCS can effectively alter multiple
brain functions in healthy humans and is suggested as a therapeutic tool in several neurological and
psychiatric diseases. However, variability of results is an important limitation of this method. This
variability may be due to multiple factors, including age, head and brain anatomy (including skull,
skin, CSF and meninges), cognitive reserve and baseline performance level, specific task demands,
as well as comorbidities in clinical settings. Different electrode montages are a further source of
variability between tDCS studies. A procedure to estimate the electric field generated by specific tDCS
electrode configurations, which can be helpful to adapt stimulation protocols, is the computational finite element method. This approach is useful to provide a priori modeling of the current spread
and electric field intensity that will be generated according to the implemented electrode montage.
Here, we present standard, non-personalized model-based electric field simulations for motor,
dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior parietal cortex stimulation according to twenty typical tDCS
electrode configurations using two different current flow modeling software packages. The resulting
simulated maximum intensity of the electric field, focality, and current spread were similar, but
not identical, between models. The advantages and limitations of both mathematical simulations
of the electric field are presented and discussed systematically, including aspects that, at present,
prevent more widespread application of respective simulation approaches in the field of non-invasive
brain stimulation | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Current flow | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Current intensity | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Electric field | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | Finite element method | es_ES |
dc.subject.other | tDCS | es_ES |
dc.title | Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/biology10121230 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | 61 Psicología | es_ES |