The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is an instrument for the neuropsychological evaluation of
cognitive and emotional decision making (DM) processes that was created to test the
somatic marker hypothesis (SMH) described by Damasio in 1994. It was initially applied
to patients with frontal lobe lesions due to its association with executive functions but
was subsequently used on patients with a variety of disorders. Although the DM process
is inherently perceptual, few studies have applied the IGT to examine DM processes in
patients with eating disorders (EDs), and even fewer have associated the IGT to the
perceptual distortion of body image (PDBI) in this population. People diagnosed with ED
exhibit heightened control over their somatic responses—for example, they can delay
digestion for hours—and DM may be affected in this condition. This study compares the
performance of two samples of adolescent women—hospitalized patients with ED, and
healthy controls with similar demographic characteristics—on the IGT using body image
as a possible factor in the SMH. Seventy-four women with a mean age of 14.97 years
(SD = 2.347) participated. To analyze their body self-image, we used the figure-rating
scale and compared the results with their body mass index (BMI). Correlations between
indices of the IGT and distortion in body image were then explored. The results revealed
significant differences between the groups in terms of evolving performance on the
partial IGT. Patients with ED performed worse than their healthy counterparts in the
last 40 trials and exhibited greater distortions in their body image, especially in terms of
overestimation. Indices of these distortions were negatively correlated with the total IGT.
These results are compatible with the SMH because they suggest that patients with ED
evinced blindness with regard to the future, as described by their authors. In addition,
a negative correlation was found between the IGT and PDBI, showing that a more
distorted body image was associated with lower IGT, that is, more disadvantageous
or riskier decisions were made by the subjects with more distortion.