Universities strive to ensure quality education focused on the diversity of the student body.
According to experiential learning theory, students display different learning preferences. This study
has a three-fold objective: to compare learning styles based on personal and educational variables, to
analyze the association between learning styles, the level of academic performance, and consistency
of performance in four assessment methods, and to examine the influence of learning dimensions in
students with medium-high performance in the assessment methods. An interdisciplinary approach
was designed involving 289 psychology, early childhood education and primary education students
at two universities in Spain. The Learning Style Inventory was used to assess learning styles and
dimensions. The assessment methods used in the developmental psychology course included the
following question formats: multiple-choice, short answer, creation-elaboration and an elaboration
question on the relationship between theory and practice. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis,
and binomial logistic models were computed. The results reveal Psychology students to be more
assimilative (theoretical and abstract), while early childhood and primary education students were
evenly distributed among styles and were more divergent and convergent (practical) in absolute
terms. In addition, high scores in perception (abstract conceptualization) were associated with a high
level of performance on the multiple-choice tests and the elaboration question on the relationship
between theory and practice. Abstract conceptualization was also associated with medium-high
performance in all assessment methods and this variable predicted consistent high performance,
independent of the assessment method. This study highlights the importance of promoting abstract
conceptualization. Recommendations for enhancing this learning dimension are presented.