Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández Costa, Damián
dc.contributor.authorGómez Salgado, Juan 
dc.contributor.authorFagundo Rivera, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Iglesias, Juan Jesús 
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T10:41:21Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T10:41:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.identifier.citationFernández Costa, D., Gómez Salgado, J., Fagundo Rivera, J. ... García Iglesias, J. J. (2020). Alternatives to the Use of Mechanical Restraints in the Management of Agitation or Aggressions of Psychiatric Patients: A Scoping Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(9), 2791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092791es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10272/18863
dc.description.abstractCoercive measures are a highly controversial issue in mental health. Although scientific evidence on their impact is limited, they are frequently used. Furthermore, they lead to a high number of ethical, legal, and clinical repercussions on both patients, and professionals and institutions. This review aims to assess the impact of the main alternative measures to prevent or limit the use of coercive measures with restraints in the management of agitated psychiatric patients. The research was conducted following the guidelines recommended by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) in Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, LILACS, and Health Database of records between 2015 and 2020. After a critical reading, 21 valid articles were included. Both simple interventions and complex restraint programs were evaluated. Training in de-escalation techniques, risk assessment, and implementation of the “six core strategies” or “Safewards” program were the most assessed and effective interventions to reduce aggressive behaviors and the use of coercive measures. According to the revised literature, it is possible to reduce the use of restraints and coercive measures and not increase the number of incidents and violent behaviors among the patients through a non-invasive and non-pharmacological approach. However, further research and further randomized clinical trials are needed to compare the different alternatives and provide higher quality evidence.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher’s versión
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherAgitationes_ES
dc.subject.otherAggressive behaviorses_ES
dc.subject.otherMental disorderses_ES
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryes_ES
dc.subject.otherMechanical restraintes_ES
dc.titleAlternatives to the Use of Mechanical Restraints in the Management of Agitation or Aggressions of Psychiatric Patients: A Scoping Reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm9092791
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España

Copyright © 2008-2010. ARIAS MONTANO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
Contact Us | Send Feedback |